Submitted by: Mark Lowry
Idiocy of defining any crime as a hate crime is beyond all reason. Crimes against property of any kind including our own person are by definition a hate crime. People don’t kill other people out of loving them. In order to have a hate crime their must be the anti thesis or a love crime. One can not exist without the other.
Definition of criminal acts in specified stages of “hatred” are created to limit freedom of all of us. The law was designed to provide for the preservation of our freedoms not to destroy them.
Given that consideration, treasonous acts committed by our President in violation of the first amendment and prohibition of government support for any religion, the crime committed by our president is not by definition a hate crime against the USA although he has demonstrated as his former pastor did that God should damn America.
This crime of using tax dollars to support the Muslim religion (a religion that is well known for its attacks on the USA, its Judeo Christian heritage and its constitutional rule of law that it insists should be replaced by Sharia law,) is a cold and calculating criminal act that lacks any passion. It is a designed effort to undermine the USA culture, its constitutional rule of law and our very freedom.
If the president of the USA can intentionally provide aid and comfort to known enemies of the USA who are killing our citizens around the world under the international Jihad declared over 10 years ago, there is no Constitutional Republic rule of law left.
Our constitution was designed with the ability to bring charges of treason against the president
(more…)